AI is no longer an experiment in software development.
For most organisations, it’s already embedded in how code is written, reviewed, and shipped.
Developers use AI assistants to generate features, refactor logic, fix bugs, and accelerate delivery. For leadership teams, this often feels like progress by default. Faster output. Lower costs. Shorter roadmaps.
But there’s a growing blind spot hiding beneath that speed.
The question leaders rarely ask is not whether AI is involved in their software.
It’s who is actually checking what the AI is producing.
AI Has Changed How Code Is Written, Not How It’s Governed
AI-assisted development has fundamentally altered the pace of software delivery. Code that once took weeks can now be produced in days. In some cases, hours.
What hasn’t changed at the same rate is how that code is reviewed, validated, and governed.
Most organisations still rely on:
Manual reviews by overstretched teams
Spot checks rather than full visibility
Trust that “someone must have looked at it”
This worked when development was slower and more deliberate. It breaks down when AI is generating large volumes of code at speed.
The result is a widening gap between how fast software is created and how well it’s understood.
The Hidden Risk Inside AI-Generated Code
AI doesn’t just write original logic. It draws from vast pools of existing patterns, libraries, and examples. That introduces several risks that are easy to miss if no one is checking systematically.
These include:
- Open-source components with unclear or incompatible licences
- Security vulnerabilities copied from common patterns
- Code that works, but is brittle, complex, or hard to maintain
- Intellectual property ambiguity around what is truly proprietary
- Open-source components with unclear or incompatible licences
Individually, these issues may seem minor. Collectively, they can become serious problems during audits, customer reviews, fundraising, or M&A.
The danger isn’t that AI writes bad code.
The danger is assuming that speed equals safety.
Why Leaders Often Assume “AI Makes It Better”
From a leadership perspective, AI feels like a net positive:
- Development appears faster
- Teams seem more productive
- Output increases without obvious downside
- Development appears faster
What’s missing is visibility. Most leaders never see the code. They see delivery milestones, velocity metrics, and product demos.
Without independent insight into what’s actually being shipped, it’s easy to believe that AI automatically improves quality. In reality, AI accelerates whatever process already exists, good or bad.
If governance is weak, AI scales risk just as efficiently as it scales output.
This Is No Longer Just a Technical Issue
Unchecked AI-generated code doesn’t stay confined to engineering.
It affects:
- Security exposure and breach risk
- Licensing and legal compliance
- Valuation during investment or exit
- Buyer confidence in diligence
- Board-level accountability
- Security exposure and breach risk
When issues surface, they rarely do so quietly. They appear during high-stakes moments, when timelines are tight and trust matters most.
At that point, leaders are forced to answer questions they were never equipped to answer clearly:
- What’s actually inside our software?
- How much of this code do we truly own?
- Where are the risks we didn’t see coming?
- What’s actually inside our software?
Speed Without Visibility Increases Exposure
AI has made software development faster than ever. But speed alone is not a strategy.
The organisations that benefit most from AI are not the ones writing the most code. They’re the ones that pair speed with visibility and governance.
That means:
- Independent verification of what’s being shipped
- Clear understanding of security, licensing, and quality
- Evidence leaders can rely on, not assumptions
- Independent verification of what’s being shipped
AI doesn’t remove the need for oversight. It makes it more important.
The Bottom Line
AI is now writing a significant portion of modern software.
What determines success isn’t whether you use it, but whether you understand its output.
Speed without visibility increases exposure.
Software still needs governance, especially when AI is involved.
The question isn’t if AI is in your codebase.
It’s whether anyone is actually checking what it’s putting there.
Want to Learn More?
